Key result
An editorial discussing the implications and potential unforeseen consequences of coronary artery stenting.
May prompt reevaluation of stenting indications; leaves open rigorous study of unintended long-term effects.
Journal Article Stenting of coronary arteries. Are we the sorcerer's apprentice? Get access P. W. SERRUYS, P. W. SERRUYS Thoraxcenter, Erasmus UniversityRotterdam, The Netherlands Address for correspondence: Patrick W. Serruys, Catheterisation Laboratory, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdan, The Netherlands. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar K. J. BEATT, K. J. BEATT Thoraxcenter, Erasmus UniversityRotterdam, The Netherlands Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar W. J. VAN DER GIESSEN W. J. VAN DER GIESSEN Thoraxcenter, Erasmus UniversityRotterdam, The Netherlands Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar European Heart Journal, Volume 10, Issue 9, September 1989, Pages 774–782, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059570 Published: 01 September 1989 Article history Received: 13 June 1989 Accepted: 21 June 1989 Published: 01 September 1989
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serruys et al. (1989) conducted an editorial in Coronary artery disease. Coronary stenting was evaluated. An editorial discussing the implications and potential unforeseen consequences of coronary artery stenting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: