Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives To assess the diagnostic performance, predictors, and clinical utility of MRI-guided prostate biopsy over an 18 year period in a real-world tertiary care setting. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent MRI-guided prostate biopsy between 2006 and 2024 at a German tertiary care center. Clinical data, PI-RADS, PSA levels, prostate volume, and biopsy outcomes were evaluated. Logistic regression models assessed associations between clinical variables and cancer detection, clinical significance (ISUP ≥ 3), and upgrading after radical prostatectomy (RPE). Results Among 496 patients (mean age 66 ± 8 years; PSA, median (IQR): 7.2 ng/ml (5–10)), cancer was detected in 33% (162/496), with 29% (47/162) classified as clinically significant. In our biopsy cohort (PI-RADS 3: 12.7%, PI-RADS 4: 43.0%, PI-RADS 5: 5.6%), clinically significant prostate cancer (ISUP ≥ 3) was detected in 3.2% of PI-RADS 3, 12.2% of PI-RADS 4, and 28.6% of PI-RADS 5 lesions. PI-RADS 5 lesions were strongly associated with cancer detection (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.35–10.13) and significant disease (OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.38–55.15), independent of age, prostate volume, and biopsy extent. While these covariates predicted overall biopsy positivity ( p < 0.02), they were not associated with significant cancer ( p > 0.05) or upgrading at RPE ( p > 0.05). Among 29 RPE patients, only one was upgraded. Post-biopsy CT was performed in all patients: MRI-guided biopsy was associated with a low complication rate: minor localized bleeding occurred in 4.4% of cases, and no major adverse events were observed. Conclusions MRI-guided prostate biopsy showed high diagnostic accuracy and safety in routine care. PI-RADS was the key predictor of clinically significant cancer. The low rate of upgrading after RPE supports its reliability in guiding patient management and avoiding overtreatment. Clinical relevance statement MRI-guided prostate biopsy enables accurate detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with low risk of understaging, supporting its routine use in personalized urologic oncology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogl et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: