Key result
Electromechanical wave imaging maps infarct locations by detecting lower velocities in post-infarct border zones.
Why the study?
Does electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) detect infarct formation and changes in electromechanical wave velocity in a large animal model of myocardial infarction?
Does electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) detect infarct formation and changes in electromechanical wave velocity in a large animal model of myocardial infarction?
Electromechanical wave imaging can non-invasively detect myocardial infarction and identify border zones with reduced wave velocities, potentially aiding in the characterization of arrhythmogenic substrates.
EWI detects infarct borders and reduced velocities in large animals; leaves open human validation for arrhythmogenic substrate imaging.
Echocardiography is often used in the clinic for detection and characterization of myocardial infarction. Electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) is a non-invasive ultrasound-based imaging technique based on time-domain incremental motion and strain estimation that can evaluate changes in contractility in the heart. In this study, electromechanical activation is assessed in infarcted heart to determine whether EWI is capable of detecting and monitoring infarct formation. Additionally, methods for estimating electromechanical wave (EW) velocity are presented, and changes in the EW propagation velocity after infarct formation are studied. Five (n = 5) adult mongrels were used in this study. Successful infarct formation was achieved in three animals by ligation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Dogs were survived for a few days after LAD ligation and monitored daily with EWI. At the end of the survival period, dogs were sacrificed and TTC (tetrazolium chloride) staining confirmed the formation and location of the infarct. In all three dogs, as soon as day 1 EWI was capable of detecting late-activated and non-activated regions, which grew over the next few days. On final day images, the extent of these regions corresponded to the location of infarct as confirmed by staining. EW velocities in border zones of infarct were significantly lower post-infarct formation when compared to baseline, whereas velocities in healthy tissues were not. These results indicate that EWI and EW velocity might help with the detection of infarcts and their border zones, which may be useful for characterizing arrhythmogenic substrate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costet et al. (2017) studied Myocardial infarction (n=5). Electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) vs. Baseline / TTC staining was evaluated on Detection of late-activated and non-activated regions and EW velocity changes. Electromechanical wave imaging successfully detected late-activated and non-activated regions corresponding to infarct location, with significantly lower EW velocities in border zones post-infarct.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: