This study examined what kinds of groups can be identified according to students’ task-values across four subject domains (languages, math and science, social sciences, practical subjects) and the related gender differences using a person-centered approach. Latent class analysis was applied to classify 638 students (mean age = 15) into four task-value groups, namely, all-subjects (55%), practical-subjects (5.7%), high-math-and-science (20.2%) and low-math-and-science (19.1%) groups. Significant gender differences were found: boys dominated the high-math-and-science group (boys = 98%), while girls dominated the low-math-and-science group (girls = 82%). Compared to the low-math-and-science group, the high-math-and-science group reported a stronger tendency in furthering their studies immediately after the completion of compulsory education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chow et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: