PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1979Circulation155 citations

Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography.

View Full Paper
KCKeith CarrRERobert L. EnglerJFJ R Forsythe

Key Result

Mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography correlated strongly with cineangiography for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.93), proving more reliable than conventional M-mode.

Study Design

Type

Observational

Structured PICO

Is mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography more reliable than M-mode echocardiography for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction?

P
Population
Patients undergoing left ventricular imaging (specific demographics and sample size not stated in the abstract)
I
Intervention
Mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography (sector scans)
C
Comparator
M-mode echocardiography (using left ventricular cineangiography as the reference standard)
O
Outcome
Correlation of left ventricular ejection fraction with cineangiographysurrogate

Mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography provides a more reliable estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction than conventional M-mode echocardiography, despite underestimating end-diastolic volume.

Main Result

Effect estimate: r = 0.93

p-value: p=>0.33

Limitations

  • Sector scans consistently underestimated left ventricular end-diastolic volume, making its estimation unreliable with currently available methods.
  • Consistently underestimated left ventricular end-diastolic volume
  • Estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic volume is unreliable with the methods currently available

Abstract

Cross-sectional echocardiography is a new noninvasive technique for imaging the heart. We developed a method for using mechanical cross-sectional echocardiograms (sector scans) to determine left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Using left ventricular cineangiography as a standard, sector scan ejection fraction correlated better (r = 0.93) than M-mode echocardiography by any of three established methods, and the sector scan regression line did not differ from the line of identity (p greater than 0.33). Interobserver variability for sector scan ejection fraction was 2.3 +/- 1.2% (mean +/- SD). Variation between two studies performed within 24 hours and analyzed by the same observer was 1.4 +/- 1.5%. However, the sector scans consistently underestimated left ventricular end-diastolic volume. We conclude that sector scan echocardiography is more reliable than conventional M-mode technique for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction, but estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic volume is unreliable with the methods currently available.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carr et al. (1979) reported an observational. Mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography (sector scans) vs. M-mode echocardiography was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction correlation with cineangiography (r = 0.93, p=>0.33). Mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography correlated strongly with cineangiography for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.93), proving more reliable than conventional M-mode.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0eb1fe1c5e2d2319f9bc76https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.59.6.1196
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper