Key result
Mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography correlated strongly with cineangiography for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.93), proving more reliable than conventional M-mode.
Why the study?
Is mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography more reliable than M-mode echocardiography for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction?
Observational
Is mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography more reliable than M-mode echocardiography for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction?
Mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography provides a more reliable estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction than conventional M-mode echocardiography, despite underestimating end-diastolic volume.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support preferring cross-sectional over M-mode echocardiography for LVEF; leaves open prospective validation against modern standards.
Cross-sectional echocardiography is a new noninvasive technique for imaging the heart. We developed a method for using mechanical cross-sectional echocardiograms (sector scans) to determine left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Using left ventricular cineangiography as a standard, sector scan ejection fraction correlated better (r = 0.93) than M-mode echocardiography by any of three established methods, and the sector scan regression line did not differ from the line of identity (p greater than 0.33). Interobserver variability for sector scan ejection fraction was 2.3 +/- 1.2% (mean +/- SD). Variation between two studies performed within 24 hours and analyzed by the same observer was 1.4 +/- 1.5%. However, the sector scans consistently underestimated left ventricular end-diastolic volume. We conclude that sector scan echocardiography is more reliable than conventional M-mode technique for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction, but estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic volume is unreliable with the methods currently available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carr et al. (1979) reported an observational. Mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography (sector scans) vs. M-mode echocardiography was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction correlation with cineangiography (r = 0.93, p=>0.33). Mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography correlated strongly with cineangiography for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.93), proving more reliable than conventional M-mode.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: