PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 30, 2010Journal of Applied Physiology60 citationsOpen Access

Measuring FMD in the brachial artery: how important is QRS gating?

TKTinoy KizhakekuttuDGDavid D. GuttermanSPShane A. Phillips

Structured PICO

Does measurement of FMD and NMD using average brachial diameters over the entire R-R interval yield similar results to QRS-gated measurements in adults?

P
Population
72 adults (29 with type 2 diabetes mellitus, 14 healthy older adults, 17 healthy middle-aged adults, 12 healthy young adults) with a range of brachial artery distensibility.
I
Intervention
Measurement of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) using average brachial diameters over the entire R-R interval.
C
Comparator
Measurement of FMD and NMD using QRS-gated brachial artery diameter measurements (end diastole).
O
Outcome
Agreement between average and QRS-gated methods for FMD and NMD (intraclass correlation coefficients).surrogate

Abstract

Recommendations for the measurement of brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) typically suggest images be obtained at identical times in the cardiac cycle, usually end diastole (QRS complex onset). This recommendation presumes that inter-individual differences in arterial compliance are minimized. However, published evidence is conflicting. Furthermore, ECG gating is not available on many ultrasound systems; it requires an expensive software upgrade or increased image processing time. We tested whether analysis of images acquired with QRS gating or with the more simplified method of image averaging would yield similar results. We analyzed FMD and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) in 29 adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in 31 older adults and 12 young adults without diabetes, yielding a range of brachial artery distensibility. FMD and NMD were measured using recommended QRS-gated brachial artery diameter measurements and, alternatively, the average brachial diameters over the entire R-R interval. We found strong agreement between both methods for FMD and NMD (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.88-0.99). Measuring FMD and NMD using average diameter measurements significantly reduced post-image-processing time (658.9 ± 71.6 vs. 1,024.1 ± 167.6 s for QRS-gated analysis, P < 0.001). FMD and NMD measurements based on average diameter measurements can be performed without reducing accuracy. This finding may allow for simplification of FMD measurement and aid in the development of FMD as a potentially useful clinical tool.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kizhakekuttu et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0eb2c6b7cc3b883f22a428https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00532.2010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Importance of Measuring the Time Course of Flow-Mediated Dilatation in Humans2007 · 399 citations
  2. 2Assessment of flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery: effects of technical aspects of the FMD measurement on the FMD response2004 · 240 citations
  3. 3Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery2002 · 4,607 citations
  4. 4Prognostic Significance of Endothelial Dysfunction in Hypertensive Patients2001 · 1,064 citations
  5. 5Arterial Abnormalities in the Offspring of Patients with Premature Myocardial Infarction2000 · 198 citations