Key result
Left ventricular pacing via limited thoracotomy was feasible and safe after failed transvenous implantation, achieving optimal lead position in 100% of patients with no surgical complications.
Why the study?
Does left ventricular pacing via limited thoracotomy provide a feasible and safe alternative in patients with failed transvenous implantation for cardiac resynchronisation therapy?
Observational (n=33)
Does left ventricular pacing via limited thoracotomy provide a feasible and safe alternative in patients with failed transvenous implantation for cardiac resynchronisation therapy?
Limited thoracotomy for epicardial lead implantation is a safe and feasible second-line option for CRT delivery when transvenous approaches fail.
May support limited thoracotomy as CRT alternative after transvenous failure; hypothesis-generating, requires prospective validation before practice change.
AIMS: Left ventricular (LV) pacing via transvenous implantation has an overall success rate ranging from 88% to 92%. The aim of this study was to assess whether LV pacing via limited thoracotomy would be feasible and safe when used on a routine basis for those cases in which standard transvenous procedures proved to be ineffective or unsatisfactory. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 33 patients (8 females, 65+/-10 years) who experienced a transvenous implantation failure. All patients underwent a limited thoracotomy and an epicardial lead was implanted. The procedure time was 51+/-28 min. No surgical or post-operative complications occurred and optimal lateral position was achieved for all patients. In the 12 months follow-up period, 5 patients died from refractory heart failure, the remaining patients did not experience complications. At implant, the mean pacing threshold was 1.3+/-0.7 V, bi-ventricular pacing impedance was 476+/-201 Omega and R-wave amplitude was 15.0+/-6.1 mV. No significant differences were found in any of the electrical parameters between baseline and follow-up. Significant improvement was observed in functional and echocardiographic parameters. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a combined approach to cardiac resynchronisation therapy delivery, including a transvenous attempt followed by a back up thoracotomic procedure, could potentially guarantee the success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrea Puglisi (2004) conducted an observational in Heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronisation therapy (n=33). Limited thoracotomy for epicardial lead implantation was evaluated on Feasibility and safety (surgical/post-operative complications and optimal lead position). Left ventricular pacing via limited thoracotomy was feasible and safe after failed transvenous implantation, achieving optimal lead position in 100% of patients with no surgical complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: