This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the SARC-F to Arabic and to assess the reliability and validity of the scale for use among community-dwelling older adults in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Older adults aged 60 years and above were included. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation process followed standardized guidelines. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were evaluated over two visits one week apart. Moreover, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the SARC-F were calculated. The validity of the Arabic version of the SARC-F was assessed against other measurements related to sarcopenia. RESULTS: A total of 182 community-dwelling older adults were enrolled (mean age = 65 ± 5.2 years). The internal consistency with the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.71. For the test-retest reliability with a one-week interval, the ICC was 0.94. The Arabic SARC-F scale was significantly associated with other measurements related to sarcopenia. The sensitivity of the Arabic SARC-F ranged from 28 to 50%, and the specificity ranged from 81.4 to 82.9%. CONCLUSION: The SARC-F was successfully translated and adapted into the Arabic language. The Arabic SARC-F showed excellent reliability and adequate validity but revealed low sensitivity with high specificity across different sarcopenia definitions, which indicates that it can detect the absence of sarcopenia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alqahtani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: