Key result
Rising lactate linked to ~23% lower cardioversion success in ED patients with AF.
Why the study?
In critically ill patients with AF, standard treatment algorithms might not be applicable, and the association between lactate and cardioversion success rates at the ED was unclear.
Does critical illness severity (measured by serum lactate levels) reduce cardioversion success in patients with atrial fibrillation presenting to the emergency department?
Cohort (n=3,535)
No
Does critical illness severity (measured by serum lactate levels) reduce cardioversion success in patients with atrial fibrillation presenting to the emergency department?
In emergency department patients with atrial fibrillation, higher lactate levels are associated with lower medical cardioversion success, whereas electrical cardioversion remains highly effective regardless of critical illness severity.
Higher lactate associated with lower ED AF cardioversion success; leaves open whether lactate modifies response or marks illness severity.
In critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), standard treatment algorithms might not be applicable. Emergency departments (ED) play a crucial role in implementing individualized treatment approaches. The aim of this study was to assess the association of lactate and cardioversion success rates in AF patients presenting to an ED. This was a retrospective single-center study analyzing 3535 AF episodes between 2012 and 2022. The main outcome was cardioversion (CV) to sinus rhythm (SR) depending on serum lactate levels (mmol/L). Lactate levels were divided into quintiles (lac < 1.1, 1.1-1.3, 1.4-1.7, 1.8-2.3 and > 2.3 mmol/L). Overall CV success declined with rising lactate levels (SR: lac < 1.1 79% (n = 547), 1.1-1.3 76% (n = 579), 1.4-1.7 73% (n = 562), 1.8-2.3 66% (n = 447), > 2.3 mmol/L 61% (n = 393); p < 0.001). Electrical CV (eCV) was conducted in 1021 (SR 95%), medical CV (mCV) in 706 (SR: 72%), facilitated CV in 523 (SR: 88%) and spontaneous conversion was observed in 591 (46% of all patients without treatment) cases. ECV was effective independent of lactate levels (SR: lac < 1.1 96% (n = 225), 1.1-1.3 93% (n = 253), 1.4-1.7 97% (n = 228), 1.8-2.3 92% (n = 154), > 2.3 mmol/L 95% (n = 106); p = 0.716). However, for mCV, conversion success decreased with increasing lactate levels (SR: lac < 1.1 84% (n = 95), 1.1-1.3 80% (n = 109), 1.4-1.7 75% (n = 115), 1.8-2.3 67% (n = 93), > 2.3 mmol/L 59% (n = 97); p < 0.001). Overall cardioversion success was less likely with rising lactate levels; especially medical cardioversion success rates decreased. Therefore, AF in critically ill may benefit from either electrical cardioversion, treatment of the underlying condition, or primary rate control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=3,535). High serum lactate (> 2.3 mmol/L) vs. Low serum lactate (< 1.1 mmol/L) was evaluated on Cardioversion success (restoration of sinus rhythm < 24 h) (p=<0.001). Cardioversion success in emergency department patients with atrial fibrillation declined significantly with rising lactate levels, from 79% (lactate <1.1 mmol/L) to 61% (lactate >2.3 mmol/L).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: