This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The field of explainable artificial intelligence emerged in response to the growing need for more transparent and reliable models. However, using raw features to provide explanations has been discussed in several works lately, advocating for more user-understandable explanations. To address this issue, a wide range of papers proposing Concept-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (C-XAI) methods have been published in recent years. Nevertheless, a unified categorization and precise field definition are still missing. This paper fills the gap by offering a thorough review of C-XAI approaches. We identify and define different concepts and explanation types. We propose a taxonomy comprising nine categories and guidelines for selecting a suitable category based on the application context. Additionally, we discuss common evaluation strategies including metrics, human evaluations, and datasets employed, aiming to assist the development of future methods. Overall, we believe this survey will assist researchers, practitioners, and domain experts in enhancing their understanding and contributing to the progress of this innovative field.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poeta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: