PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1991Circulation191 citations

Circumferential myocardial shortening in the normal human left ventricle. Assessment by magnetic resonance imaging using spatial modulation of magnetization.

View Full Paper
NCN R ClarkNRNathaniel ReichekPBPhilip Bergey

Key Result

MRI with spatial modulation of magnetization revealed a transmural gradient in circumferential shortening in normal left ventricles (endocardial 44% vs epicardial 22%, p<0.0001).

Key Points

  • To assess circumferential myocardial shortening in the normal human left ventricle using advanced MRI techniques.
  • Used magnetic resonance imaging with spatial modulation of magnetization to tag myocardial segments.
  • Analyzed circumferential shortening at endocardial, midwall, and epicardial levels in 10 volunteers.
  • Measured stripe separation at end-systole and late-systole to evaluate regional myocardial function.
  • Endocardial segment shortening was greater than epicardial shortening (44% vs 22%, p<0.0001).
  • Shortening varied from apex to base, with apical slices showing more shortening at midwall (34%) and endocardium (49%) compared to basal slices (28% midwall, 39% endocardium, p<0.05 and p<0.01).
  • Transmural and longitudinal heterogeneity in circumferential shortening was confirmed.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=10)

Structured PICO

P
Population
10 normal volunteers
I
Intervention
Electrocardiographically gated magnetic resonance imaging with spatial modulation of magnetization
O
Outcome
Circumferential myocardial shorteningsurrogate

Magnetic resonance imaging with spatial modulation of magnetization demonstrates transmural and longitudinal heterogeneity of circumferential shortening in the normal human left ventricle.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.0001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional cardiac imaging methods do not depict true segmental myocardial shortening, since they cannot determine segment length between fixed points in the myocardium. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used electrocardiographically gated magnetic resonance imaging with spatial modulation of magnetization to noninvasively "tag" the myocardium with dark stripes at uniform 7-mm intervals center to center at end diastole. We then determined end-systolic stripe separation and thereby calculated circumferential shortening. When end systole was not reached in the first image series, a second temporally overlapped series starting in late systole was used to determine late-systolic shortening. Septal, anterior, lateral, and inferior segments were assessed at endocardium, midwall, and epicardium on five midventricular short-axis sections each in 10 normal volunteers. A transmural gradient in circumferential shortening was observed, with the percentage of endocardial segment shortening consistently greater than epicardial segment shortening (epicardial, 22 +/- 5%; midwall, 30 +/- 6%; and endocardial, 44 +/- 6%; p less than 0.0001 by analysis of variance). Circumferential shortening varied from apex to base with slices closer to the base of the left ventricle showing less shortening at the midwall (28 +/- 9%) and endocardium (39 +/- 6%) than more apical slices at the midwall (34 +/- 13%) and endocardium (49 +/- 9%) (p less than 0.05 and p less than 0.01, respectively, by analysis of variance). CONCLUSIONS: Transmural and longitudinal heterogeneity of circumferential shortening is present in the normal human left ventricle. Magnetic resonance imaging with spatial modulation of magnetization is a powerful new tool for assessment of circumferential shortening and provides information unobtainable with conventional imaging methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Clark et al. (1991) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=10). Magnetic resonance imaging with spatial modulation of magnetization was evaluated on Circumferential myocardial shortening (p=<0.0001). MRI with spatial modulation of magnetization revealed a transmural gradient in circumferential shortening in normal left ventricles (endocardial 44% vs epicardial 22%, p<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ec07937aeb0126447a781https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.84.1.67
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper