Key result
AF drivers associate with ~0.3 mm thicker atrial walls compared to passively activated areas.
Why the study?
Atrial wall thickness and degree of late-gadolinium enhancement as an atrial fibrillation substrate have not been fully validated in humans.
Does atrial wall thickness in normal/mild late-gadolinium enhancement areas predict the presence of atrial fibrillation drivers in patients with persistent AF?
Observational (n=15)
Does atrial wall thickness in normal/mild late-gadolinium enhancement areas predict the presence of atrial fibrillation drivers in patients with persistent AF?
Evaluating atrial wall thickness in normal or mild late-gadolinium enhancement areas may help accurately identify the location of atrial fibrillation drivers in patients with persistent AF.
May help localize AF drivers via wall thickness in normal/mild LGE; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background Some of atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers are found in normal/mild late‐gadolinium enhancement (LGE) areas, as well as moderate ones. The atrial wall thickness (AWT) has been reported to be important as a possible AF substrate. However, the AWT and degree of LGEs as an AF substrate has not been fully validated in humans. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the AWT in normal/mild LGE areas on AF drivers. Methods A total of 287 segments in 15 persistent AF patients were assessed. AF drivers were defined as non‐passively activated areas (NPAs), where rotational activation was frequently observed, and were detected by the novel real‐time phase mapping (ExTRa Mapping), mild LGE areas were defined as areas with a volume ratio of the enhancement voxel of 0% to <10%. The AWT was defined as the minimum distance from the manually determined endocardium to the epicardial border on the LGE‐MRI. Results NPAs were found in 20 (18.0%) of 131 normal/mild LGE areas where AWT was significantly thicker than that in the passively activated areas (PAs) (2.5 ± 0.3 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3 mm, p < .001). However, NPAs were found in 41 (26.3%) of 156 moderate LGE areas where AWT was thinner than that of PAs (2.1 ± 0.2 mm vs. 2.23 ± 0.3 mm, p = .02). An ROC curve analysis yielded an optimal cutoff value of 2.2 mm for predicting the presence of an NPA in normal/mild LGE areas. Conclusion The location of AF drivers in normal/mild LGE areas might be more accurately identified by evaluating AWT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakamura et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=15). Atrial wall thickness (AWT) evaluation vs. Passively activated areas (PAs) was evaluated on Atrial wall thickness in non-passively activated areas (NPAs) vs passively activated areas (PAs) within normal/mild LGE areas (p=<.001). Atrial wall thickness in normal/mild LGE areas was significantly thicker in non-passively activated areas (AF drivers) compared to passively activated areas (2.5 vs. 2.2 mm, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: