Key result
Circulating biomarkers reflect HF remodeling processes but largely fail to enter clinical practice.
Why the study?
Most biomarkers reflecting cardiac remodelling have failed to enter clinical practice, potentially due to the biological complexity of remodelling and an incomplete understanding of their pathophysiological roles.
This review discusses the cellular and molecular mechanisms of cardiac remodelling and the potential role of circulating biomarkers in reflecting these processes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Most HF remodelling biomarkers remain research tools only; leaves open validation for clinical adoption.
Cardiac remodelling refers to changes in left ventricular structure and function over time, with a progressive deterioration that may lead to heart failure (HF) development (adverse remodelling) or vice versa a recovery (reverse remodelling) in response to HF treatment. Adverse remodelling predicts a worse outcome, whilst reverse remodelling predicts a better prognosis. The geometry, systolic and diastolic function and electric activity of the left ventricle are affected, as well as the left atrium and on the long term even right heart chambers. At a cellular and molecular level, remodelling involves all components of cardiac tissue: cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells and leucocytes. The molecular, cellular and histological signatures of remodelling may differ according to the cause and severity of cardiac damage, and clearly to the global trend toward worsening or recovery. These processes cannot be routinely evaluated through endomyocardial biopsies, but may be reflected by circulating levels of several biomarkers. Different classes of biomarkers (e.g. proteins, non-coding RNAs, metabolites and/or epigenetic modifications) and several biomarkers of each class might inform on some aspects on HF development, progression and long-term outcomes, but most have failed to enter clinical practice. This may be due to the biological complexity of remodelling, so that no single biomarker could provide great insight on remodelling when assessed alone. Another possible reason is a still incomplete understanding of the role of biomarkers in the pathophysiology of cardiac remodelling. Such role will be investigated in the first part of this review paper on biomarkers of cardiac remodelling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González et al. (2022) conducted a review in Cardiac remodelling and heart failure. Circulating biomarkers may reflect the complex cellular and molecular processes of cardiac remodelling in heart failure, though most have failed to enter clinical practice.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: