Importance: Medical time series constitute the largest data type in electronic health records and are often irregularly sampled in real-world clinical settings. Such irregularly sampled medical time series exhibit uneven time intervals, missing observations, and heterogeneous sampling rates, posing substantial challenges for deep learning models. Highlights: In this paper, from an irregularity-aware and data-centric perspective, we categorize existing deep learning methods for irregularly sampled medical time series into missing-data-based and raw-data-based approaches. We analyze their theoretical foundations and practical implications and conduct experiments on benchmark and real-world medical datasets to compare their strengths and limitations. Conclusion: Based on these analyses, we provide practical recommendations and discuss open problems and future research directions for modeling irregularly sampled medical time series.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: