Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The automation of educational and instructional assessment plays a crucial role in enhancing the quality of teaching management. In physics education, calculation problems with intricate problem-solving ideas pose challenges to the intelligent grading of tests. This study explores the automatic grading of physics problems through a combination of large language models and prompt engineering. By comparing the performance of four prompt strategies (one-shot, few-shot, chain of thought, tree of thought) within two large model frameworks, namely ERNIEBot-4-turbo and GPT-4o. This study finds that the tree of thought prompt can better assess calculation problems with complex ideas (N = 100, ACC ≥ 0.9, kappa > 0.8) and reduce the performance gap between different models. This research provides valuable insights for the automation of assessments in physics education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: