The machine learning-derived adverse profile cluster (Cluster 2) was associated with a 3.84-fold increased risk of mortality, LVAD implantation, or heart transplantation compared to Cluster 1.
Cohort (n=524)
No
524 patients with advanced heart failure (NYHA class III-IV, LVEF ≤25%, persistent severe symptoms despite optimal medical therapy), median age 53, 85.3% male, evaluated at a tertiary cardiovascular center.
Composite of all-cause mortality, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, or heart transplantationcomposite
Effect estimate: HR 3.84 (95% CI 2.72-5.43)
Absolute Event Rate: 50% vs 15.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Introduction Advanced heart failure (HF) is a clinically heterogeneous condition with poor prognosis, and traditional classification systems often fail to capture the complexity needed for personalized care. This study aimed to identify clinically meaningful phenotypic subgroups among patients with advanced HF using unsupervised machine learning and to evaluate their association with long-term outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 524 patients with advanced HF who underwent comprehensive clinical, echocardiographic, hemodynamic, and cardiopulmonary exercise assessments. Using k-means clustering on standardized, multidimensional data, two distinct phenotypes were identified. The primary composite outcome was defined as all-cause mortality, left ventricular assist device implantation, or heart transplantation. Associations between cluster assignment and outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results The first cluster, representing patients with relatively preserved hemodynamics and functional status, was associated with a more favorable prognosis, while the second cluster included older individuals with significant biventricular dysfunction, higher pulmonary pressures, and poorer exercise capacity. These patients experienced a markedly higher rate of the composite outcome over a median follow-up of 2.4 years, with Cluster 2 showing a significantly increased risk (hazard ratio HR: 3.84; 95% CI: 2.72–5.43; p 0.001). Conclusion Machine learning–based clustering revealed two distinct phenotypes in advanced HF with differing clinical features and prognoses. This approach may enhance risk stratification and inform individualized therapeutic strategies in this high-risk population.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Murat Karaçam
State Hospital
Barkın Kültürsay
State Hospital
Deniz Mutlu
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
State Hospital
Bitlis Eren University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Karaçam et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure (n=524). Cluster 2 (Adverse Profile Cluster) vs. Cluster 1 (Favorable Profile Cluster) was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, LVAD implantation, or heart transplantation (HR 3.84, 95% CI 2.72-5.43, p=<0.001). The machine learning-derived adverse profile cluster (Cluster 2) was associated with a 3.84-fold increased risk of mortality, LVAD implantation, or heart transplantation compared to Cluster 1.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ecaada14f152feaf9d8d6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1669538