Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The gravitational waves (GWs) emitted during the coalescence of black holes (SMBHs) in the mass range similar to 10(4) -10(7) M-circle dot/(1 + z) will be detectable out to high redshifts the future Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). The distance direction to these "standard sirens'' can be inferred directly from GW signal, with a precision that depends on the masses, spins, and of the merging system. In a given cosmology, the LISA-measured distance translates into a redshift shell. We calculate the and shape of the corresponding three-dimensional error volume in an electromagnetic counterpart to a LISA event could be found, into account errors in the background cosmology ( as expected by time LISA flies), weak gravitational lensing (de) magnification due inhomogeneities along the line of sight, and potential-peculiar velocities. Weak-lensing errors largely exceed other of uncertainties (by a factor of similar to 7 for typical at z = 1). Under the plausible assumption that SMBH-SMBH are accompanied by gas accretion leading to Eddington-limited activity, we then compute the number of quasars that would be in a typical three-dimensional LISA error volume, as a function BH mass and event redshift. Low redshifts offer the best to identify quasar counterparts to cosmological standard. For mergers of similar to 4; (10(5)-10(7)) M-circle dot SMBHs, LISA error volume will typically contain a single near-Eddington at z similar to 1. If SMBHs are spinning rapidly, the error is smaller and may contain a unique quasar out to redshift z to 3. This will allow a straightforward test of the hypothesis GW events are accompanied by bright quasar activity and, if the proves correct, will guarantee the identification of a quasar counterpart to a LISA event, with a B-band luminosity of-B similar to (10(10)-10(11)) L-circle dot. Robust counterpart would allow unprecedented tests of the physics of SMBH, such as precision measurements of the Eddington ratio. They clarify the role of gas as a catalyst in SMBH coalescences and also offer an alternative method to constrain cosmological.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kocsis et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: