Key result
Ticagrelor linked to ~124% greater diurnal platelet aggregation variability than prasugrel during early AMI treatment.
Why the study?
Prasugrel and ticagrelor are contemporary P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in AMI, but their diurnal variability in platelet reactivity during the initial maintenance phase was not compared.
Does ticagrelor compared to prasugrel alter the diurnal variability of platelet reactivity in invasively-treated patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=73)
Yes
Does ticagrelor compared to prasugrel alter the diurnal variability of platelet reactivity in invasively-treated patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Ticagrelor exhibits greater diurnal variability in platelet aggregation than prasugrel during the early maintenance phase after AMI, driven by a continuous increase in platelet inhibition after the morning dose.
May influence platelet testing timing post-AMI; leaves open whether variability affects outcomes.
Background: Contemporary antiplatelet treatment in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is based on one of two P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, prasugrel or ticagrelor. The aim of this study was to compare diurnal variability of platelet reactivity between patients receiving prasugrel and ticagrelor during the initial phase of maintenance treatment after AMI. Methods: It was a prospective, two-center, pharmacodynamic, observational study. Blood for platelet testing was sampled at four time points on day four after AMI (8:00, 12:00, 16:00, 20:00). Diurnal variability of platelet reactivity was expressed as a coefficient of variation (CV) of the above-mentioned measurements. Results: 73 invasively-treated patients were enrolled (ticagrelor: n = 47, prasugrel: n = 26). CV was greater in patients treated with ticagrelor compared with prasugrel according to a VASP assay (47.8 [31.6–64.6]% vs. 21.3 [12.9–25.5]%, p < 0.001), while no statistical differences were detected when the CVs of platelet aggregation according to Multiplate were compared between ticagrelor- and prasugrel-treated patients. Ticagrelor-treated patients showed more pronounced platelet inhibition than prasugrel at 16:00 and 20:00 (VASP16:00: 20.6 ± 15.0 vs. 24.9 ± 12.8 PRI, p = 0.049; VASP20:00: 18.6 ± 17.7 vs. 26.0 ± 11.7 PRI, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Ticagrelor shows greater diurnal variability in platelet aggregation than prasugrel during the initial maintenance phase of AMI treatment, and this is due to the continuous increase of platelet inhibition after the morning maintenance dose. Both drugs provide an adequate antiplatelet effect early after AMI. Evaluation of the clinical significance of these findings warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamski et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=73). Ticagrelor vs. Prasugrel was evaluated on Diurnal variability of platelet reactivity (coefficient of variation) by VASP assay (p=< 0.001). Ticagrelor showed greater diurnal variability in platelet aggregation than prasugrel during the initial maintenance phase of AMI treatment (CV 47.8% vs 21.3%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: