Key result
SAFE-SSPE trial tests whether clinical surveillance is non-inferior to rivaroxaban for VTE in low-risk SSPE.
Why the study?
The risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulation for isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism is controversial and evidence from randomized controlled trials is lacking.
Does clinical surveillance without anticoagulation prevent symptomatic recurrent VTE non-inferiorly to rivaroxaban in low-risk patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism?
Population
Low-risk patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism
Comparison
Clinical surveillance with placebo vs anticoagulant treatment with rivaroxaban
Design
International multicentre placebo-controlled double-blind parallel-group non-inferiority trial
Follow-up
90 days
Authors
Loading...
Challenges routine anticoagulation in low-risk isolated SSPE; provides first RCT testing surveillance non-inferiority.
RCT
double-blind
randomised
Yes
Does clinical surveillance without anticoagulation prevent symptomatic recurrent VTE non-inferiorly to rivaroxaban in low-risk patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism?
This protocol outlines a trial to determine if clinical surveillance without anticoagulation is non-inferior to rivaroxaban for low-risk patients with isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism.
Baumgartner et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism. clinical surveillance with placebo vs. anticoagulant treatment with rivaroxaban was evaluated on symptomatic recurrent VTE. The SAFE-SSPE trial is a randomized, double-blind protocol designed to evaluate whether clinical surveillance is non-inferior to rivaroxaban for preventing recurrent VTE in low-risk isolated SSPE.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: