Key result
Using the V3 phenomenon successfully identified the His-bundle branching portion in 16 of 16 patients, whereas relying on the H-V interval frequently misidentified the proximal RBB as the HB (12/16).
Why the study?
Does the V3 phenomenon improve discrimination between the His-bundle and right bundle branch compared to H-V interval measurement during electrophysiologic studies in patients without structural heart disease?
Observational (n=16)
Does the V3 phenomenon improve discrimination between the His-bundle and right bundle branch compared to H-V interval measurement during electrophysiologic studies in patients without structural heart disease?
Simultaneous recordings during the V3 phenomenon accurately discriminate the His-bundle from the right bundle branch, whereas reliance on the H-V interval frequently leads to misidentification.
V3 phenomenon may aid HB identification during EPS; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify the His-bundle (HB) versus right bundle branch (RBB) during electrophysiologic studies, using the V3 phenomenon, and to compare the timing of HB versus RBB potentials of sinus cycles (His-ventricular [H-V] interval). METHODS: The study enrolled 16 patients without structural heart disease, who underwent electrophysiologic studies during which the H-V interval was within normal limits and the V3 phenomenon was induced during recordings of the HB and the RBB potentials by a multi-electrode catheter. The recording site of the earliest HB potential just before the V3 phenomenon was defined as the branching portion of His bundle (HBBP), the site immediately proximal to the HBBP as the HB, and the site immediately distal to the HBBP as the RBB. RESULTS: The HBBP was identified in all patients. In all cases but one patient, the H-V interval measured at the HB adjacent to the HBBP was > or =35 ms. However, in 12 patients, the H-V interval measured at the RBB adjacent to the HBBP was also > or =35 ms. CONCLUSIONS: The electrophysiologic identification of HB versus RBB by simultaneous recordings of HB and RBB potentials during induction of the V3 phenomenon was feasible. When the discrimination between HB and RBB was based on the measurement of the H-V interval, the proximal portion of the RBB was frequently misidentified as the HB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaneko et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Patients without structural heart disease undergoing electrophysiologic studies (n=16). Electrophysiologic identification using the V3 phenomenon vs. H-V interval measurement was evaluated on Identification of the His-bundle branching portion (HBBP). Using the V3 phenomenon successfully identified the His-bundle branching portion in 16 of 16 patients, whereas relying on the H-V interval frequently misidentified the proximal RBB as the HB (12/16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: