Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 18, 2014MicrobiologyOpenOpen Access

Comparison of DNA extraction kits and modification of DNA elution procedure for the quantitation of subdominant bacteria from piggery effluents with real‐time PCR

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JDJérémy DesneuxAPAnne‐Marie Pourcher

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Desneux et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ecffcaa1655e5fb22d59ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.178
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bacterial community dynamics in liquid swine manure during storage: molecular analysis using DGGE/PCR of 16S rDNA2001 · 88 citations
  2. 2Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation1995 · 8,384 citations
  3. 3Manure and sulfadiazine synergistically increased bacterial antibiotic resistance in soil over at least two months2006 · 461 citations
  4. 4Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation.1995 · 4,244 citations
  5. 5Selective Quantification of Viable Escherichia coli Bacteria in Biosolids by Quantitative PCR with Propidium Monoazide Modification2011 · 113 citations