Key result
Early PACs trigger two-for-one responses in 10% of AVNRT patients, while His-refractory PACs differentiate JT.
Why the study?
Early PACs advancing the immediate His with continuation of tachycardia suggest JT but can also occur in AVNRT as a two-for-one response (TFOR), prompting evaluation of the incidence, mechanism, and differentiation of TFOR from JT.
Does the response to early premature atrial complexes (ePACs) differentiate AVNRT from focal junctional tachycardia?
Observational (n=100)
Does the response to early premature atrial complexes (ePACs) differentiate AVNRT from focal junctional tachycardia?
A two-for-one response to early premature atrial complexes can occur in AVNRT and is not exclusively diagnostic of junctional tachycardia, though His refractory PACs can still differentiate the two.
AIMS: The response to premature atrial complexes (PACs) during tachycardia has been shown to differentiate atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from focal junctional tachycardia (JT). His refractory PAC (HrPACs) perturbing the next His (resetting with fusion) is diagnostic of AVNRT and such a late PAC fusing with the native beat cannot reset the focal source of JT. Early PAC advancing the immediate His with continuation of tachycardia suggests JT but can also occur in AVNRT due to simultaneous conduction through the AV nodal fast and slow pathways [two-for-one response (TFOR)]. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and mechanism of TFOR after early premature atrial complexes (ePACs) during AVNRT and to differentiate it from the known response to ePACs during JT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Typical AVNRT cases were diagnosed using standard criteria. We evaluated the responses to scanning PACs delivered during tachycardia in 100 patients undergoing AV node slow pathway modification for AVNRT. The responses to HrPACs and ePACs delivered from coronary sinus os or high right atrium were retrospectively reviewed. In 10 patients, ePACs advanced the immediate His with continuation of tachycardia. In all 10 cases, HrPACs advanced the next His, confirming AVNRT as the mechanism, and indicating a TFOR. CONCLUSION: A TFOR can occur in a small number of patients during AVNRT and is therefore not diagnostic of JT. However, HrPACs always perturbed the next His in these cases, confirming the diagnosis of AVNRT and allowing for differentiation from JT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilge et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=100). Scanning premature atrial complexes (PACs) was evaluated on Incidence of two-for-one response (TFOR) after early premature atrial complexes (ePACs). A two-for-one response to early premature atrial complexes occurred in 10% of AVNRT patients, but His refractory PACs consistently perturbed the next His, allowing differentiation from JT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: