Key result
In patients treated with edoxaban for venous thromboembolism, absolute fat-free mass showed a significant negative correlation with peak anti-factor Xa activity (rs = -0.439), whereas no significant correlation was found for rivaroxaban.
Why the study?
Evidence for DOAC treatment of VTE is based on BMI and weight rather than body composition, which varies substantially, especially in overweight and obesity.
Does body composition affect blood coagulation monitoring parameters in patients on therapeutic-dose rivaroxaban or edoxaban for venous thromboembolism?
Cross-Sectional (n=71)
No
Does body composition affect blood coagulation monitoring parameters in patients on therapeutic-dose rivaroxaban or edoxaban for venous thromboembolism?
Fat-free mass negatively correlates with peak anti-Factor Xa levels in patients taking edoxaban for VTE, suggesting body composition may influence edoxaban pharmacokinetics.
Fat-free mass may influence edoxaban anti-Xa levels; hypothesis-generating for body composition effects on DOAC monitoring in VTE.
Background/objectives Evidence for the first-line treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) by use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is based on stratification by body-mass index (BMI) and total body weight, but does not consider body composition – defined as the distribution of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM). Variability in body composition exists among patients with normal BMI, but is anticipated to be markedly greater in the context of overweight and obesity. Methods The BIARIVA prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted to assess whether body composition affects blood coagulation monitoring parameters in patients on therapeutic-dose anticoagulant treatment for VTE with oral factor (F.) Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban or edoxaban. Patients were qualified for inclusion into the study if they were categorized into one of the specified BMI categories; 18–25, 30–35, or > 35 kg/m 2 . Body composition was determined by two bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) methods. The primary endpoint was the association between body composition parameters and coagulation measurements in patients treated with rivaroxaban or edoxaban, assessed by correlation analysis. Results Thirty-six patients on rivaroxaban and 35 patients on edoxaban were finally analyzed. The main finding in this study was a significant negative correlation observed in the edoxaban group for the absolute FFM with anti-F.Xa and plasma concentration peak levels (BIA method 1: r s = −0.439, p = 0.008; BIA method 2: r s = −0.431, p = 0.010) and with the absolute increase from trough to peak in plasma concentration levels (BIA method 1 and 2: r s = −0.446, p = 0.007) and in anti-F.Xa levels (BIA method 1: r s = −0.445, p = 0.007; BIA method 2: r s = −0.444, p = 0.008). No significant correlations of body composition measures with coagulation parameters were found in the rivaroxaban group. Conclusions This study suggests that body composition might influence specific coagulation measurements in patients treated with edoxaban, but further research is required to finally determine the role of body composition in this context and to evaluate clinical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guetl et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Venous thromboembolism (n=71). Edoxaban or Rivaroxaban was evaluated on Correlation between absolute fat-free mass and peak anti-factor Xa activity in edoxaban patients (BIA method 1) (rs = -0.439, 95% CI -0.679 to -0.114, p=0.008). In patients treated with edoxaban for venous thromboembolism, absolute fat-free mass showed a significant negative correlation with peak anti-factor Xa activity (rs = -0.439), whereas no significant correlation was found for rivaroxaban.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: