Why the study?
The level of detail for individual variables in quantitative healthcare studies is often disregarded despite growing interest in data analytics to inform healthcare decisions.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers framework for standardizing variable data in quantitative studies; leaves open empirical testing before guiding research practice.
There is considerable interest in data analytics because of its value in informing decisions in healthcare. Data variables can be derived from routinely collected records or from primary studies. The level of detail for individual variables in quantitative studies is often disregarded. In this work, we aim to present the concept of a minimum dataset for any variable. The most basic level of data collection is the value of a variable. In addition, there may be an indicator of severity and a measure of duration or how long the value has been present. The time course defines how the values for a variable fluctuated over time. The validity or accuracy of the values for a variable is also important to avoid spurious findings. Finally, there may be additional modifiers which drastically change the impact of a variable. In conclusion, the minimum dataset is a framework which can be used for the purposes of study design and appraisal of studies. Not all data requires full consideration of the minimum dataset framework for each variable, but the framework may be important if more detailed results are desired.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwok et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: