Key result
Heart-rate adjustment enhances P-wave and coronary sinus activation correlation by up to ~70% during ablation.
Why the study?
The association of coronary sinus electrical activity with atrial substrate modification has been barely investigated and mostly limited to analyses during AF.
Does heart-rate adjustment improve the correlation between P-wave and coronary sinus local activation wave features in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=40)
Does heart-rate adjustment improve the correlation between P-wave and coronary sinus local activation wave features in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
p-value: p=<0.0001
Heart-rate adjustment is highly recommended when evaluating atrial substrate modification using coronary sinus electrograms during catheter ablation, as it significantly improves correlation with P-wave features.
Heart-rate adjustment may strengthen P-wave and coronary sinus correlations in paroxysmal AF ablation; hypothesis-generating for substrate assessment pending prospective trials.
Coronary sinus (CS) catheterization is critical during catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the association of CS electrical activity with atrial substrate modification has been barely investigated and mostly limited to analyses during AF. In sinus rhythm (SR), atrial substrate modification is principally assessed at a global level through P-wave analysis. Cross-correlating CS electrograms (EGMs) and P-waves’ features could potentiate the understanding of AF mechanisms. Five-minute surface lead II and bipolar CS recordings before, during, and after CA were acquired from 40 paroxysmal AF patients. Features related to duration, amplitude, and heart-rate variability of atrial activations were evaluated. Heart-rate adjustment (HRA) was applied. Correlations between each P-wave and CS local activation wave (LAW) feature were computed with cross-quadratic sample entropy (CQSE), Pearson correlation (PC), and linear regression (LR) with 10-fold cross-validation. The effect of CA between different ablation steps was compared with PC. Linear correlations: poor to mediocre before HRA for analysis at each P-wave/LAW (PC: max. +18.36%, p = 0.0017, LR: max. +5.33%, p = 0.0002) and comparison between two ablation steps (max. +54.07%, p = 0.0205). HRA significantly enhanced these relationships, especially in duration (P-wave/LAW: +43.82% to +69.91%, p < 0.0001 for PC and +18.97% to +47.25%, p < 0.0001 for LR, CA effect: +53.90% to +85.72%, p < 0.0210). CQSE reported negligent correlations (0.6−1.2). Direct analysis of CS features is unreliable to evaluate atrial substrate modification due to CA. HRA substantially solves this problem, potentiating correlation with P-wave features. Hence, its application is highly recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vraka et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (n=40). Heart-rate adjustment (HRA) vs. Unadjusted analysis was evaluated on Correlation between P-wave and coronary sinus local activation wave features (p=<0.0001). Heart-rate adjustment significantly enhanced the correlation between P-wave and coronary sinus local activation wave duration features (PC: +43.82% to +69.91%, p<0.0001) during catheter ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: