PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 26, 2016Environment and Behavior60 citationsOpen Access

Knowledge Sharing Behavior: The Role of Spatial Design in Buildings

View Full Paper
RARianne Appel‐MeulenbroekBVBauke de VriesMWMathieu Weggeman

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Knowledge sharing during unplanned face-to-face meetings between employees is indispensable for innovation-based organizations. Spatial design of office buildings has been proven to influence the number of meetings dyads have at work, but research on the behavior during such meetings remains scarce. This article analyzes how several spatial variables relate to employee behavior during such meetings (joint activities, location, intentionality, and issues addressed). A 1-week diary of 138 employees from one research organization provided data on 918 knowledge-sharing meetings. Analysis of the building layout showed that behavior is particularly different at a very local level within the building. Chi-square tests showed that inter-visibility and proximity are most strongly associated with where knowledge was shared, while sharing a room and overhearing related significantly to how knowledge was shared.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Appel‐Meulenbroek et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0edf11b7cc3b883f22d508https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516673405
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is Lived2002 · 3,835 citations
  2. 2Characterization of acoustics in open offices - four case studies2008 · 7 citations
  3. 3The Knowledge-Creating Company1995 · 17,691 citations
  4. 4Movement in workplace environments – configurational or programmed?2007 · 23 citations
  5. 5Computing and Interpreting Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes2008 · 66 citations