Key result
12-session cardiac rehab matches 24 sessions for physical activity and quality of life.
Why the study?
Short-term provision of cardiac rehabilitation may facilitate service use and meet patient needs, prompting evaluation of shorter versus longer programs.
Does a 12-session cardiac rehabilitation program provide similar improvements in physical, psychosocial, and biomedical factors compared to a 24-session program in patients with ischemic heart disease?
RCT (n=112)
Randomized
No
Does a 12-session cardiac rehabilitation program provide similar improvements in physical, psychosocial, and biomedical factors compared to a 24-session program in patients with ischemic heart disease?
A shorter 12-session cardiac rehabilitation program provides comparable benefits in physical activity and quality of life to a 24-session program, though the longer program offers greater improvements in anthropometric measures.
Supports shorter cardiac rehabilitation for equivalent activity and quality-of-life gains; extends dose-optimization evidence in ischemic heart disease.
Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a key component of effective care for patients with a wide spectrum of cardiac problems. It seems that the short-term provision of these services can facilitate their use and meeting of related needs for patients participating in the CR programs. Materials and methods In this interventional study on patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) referred to the Cardiac Rehabilitation Center of Chamran Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. One-hundred and twelve patients were randomly divided into two groups of 12 and 24 sessions of CR [mean age: 59.2 ± (9.02) and 60.7 ± (9.3) years, respectively] and underwent a CR program. All information was collected in two stages, before the beginning of the program and after completion of 12- and 24-session rehabilitation programs. The data collection tools were demographics questionnaire, the International Physical Activity Questionnaires (IPAQ), McNew Quality of Life Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). Results The results of this study showed that in both groups, total physical activity (PA) and functional capacity increased, and the quality of life (QOL) was statistically improved. Comparison of changes in mean differences at the end of the rehabilitation periods between the two groups, showed that only the weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in the 24-session group significantly decreased compared to the 12-session group and, but no significant difference in other variables was observed. Conclusion Overall, the findings of this study support the overall benefits of the CR program in both the short and the long term. Therefore it can be suggested that a short-term program can still be a valuable option for reducing the risk in cardiac patients and meeting their service needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadeghi et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Ischemic heart disease (n=112). Cardiac rehabilitation vs. 24 sessions of cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Physical activity, functional capacity, quality of life, and biomedical factors. A 12-session cardiac rehabilitation program improved physical activity and quality of life similarly to a 24-session program, though 24 sessions yielded greater reductions in weight and BMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: