Building an e#ective Information Retrieval system requires various design choices, ranging from the weighting scheme to the type of morphological normalization. The combination of runs has become a standard technique to reap the benefits of di#erent run types. Until now, systematic studies of the e#ectiveness of combination strategies have only been carried out for English. This paper provides an exploratory overview of the e#ectiveness of combination methods in nine European languages. We demonstrate that the combination of e#ective information retrieval strategies can lead to significant improvements of retrieval e#ectiveness. Furthermore, we analyze the relative impact of retrieving more relevant documents and of improved ranking of relevant documents. The experimental evidence is obtained using the 2003 testsuite of the cross-language evaluation forum (CLEF).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamps et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: