PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2022EP Europace27 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of the antibacterial envelope to prevent cardiac implantable electronic device infection in a high-risk population

View Full Paper
UCUzma ChaudhryRBRasmus BorgquistJSJ. G. Smith

Structured PICO

Does an antibacterial envelope reduce local infection in patients undergoing CIED implantation?

P
Population
526 patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=144 envelope group, n=382 matched control cohort)
I
Intervention
Antibacterial envelope (antibiotic-eluting absorbable envelope) during CIED implantation
C
Comparator
Matched cohort of CIED patients without the envelope
O
Outcome
Occurrence of local infectionsafety

The use of an antibacterial envelope during CIED implantation significantly reduces local infections, particularly in high-risk patients identified by a PADIT score >7.

Abstract

AIMS: Infection is a serious complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy. An antibiotic-eluting absorbable envelope has been developed to reduce the infection rate, but studies investigating the efficacy and a reasonable number needed to treat in high-risk populations for infections are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four patients undergoing CIED implantation who received the antibacterial envelope were compared with a matched cohort of 382 CIED patients from our institution. The primary outcome was the occurrence of local infection, and secondary outcomes were any CIED-related local or systemic infections, including endocarditis, and all-cause mortality. The results were stratified by a risk score for CIED infection, PADIT. The envelope group had a higher PADIT score, 5.9 ± 3.1 vs. 3.9 ± 3.0 (P 7 points) PADIT score, 0 vs. 9.9% (P = 0.01). The total CIED-related infections were similar between groups, 6.3% compared with 5.0% (P = 0.567). Mortality after 1600 days of follow-up did not differ between groups, 22.9 vs. 26.4%, P = 0.475. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the clinical efficacy of an antibacterial envelope in the prevention of local CIED infection in patients with a higher risk according to the PADIT score. In an effort to improve cost-benefit ratios, ration of use guided by the PADIT score is advocated. Further prospective randomized studies in high-risk populations are called for.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaudhry et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ee1dae29b511e9f2293ddhttps://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac119
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper