Why the study?
Infective complications of permanent cardiac pacing severely impact long-term outcomes, presenting challenging clinical scenarios for managing device failure in high infection risk patients.
Is hybrid permanent cardiac pacing (leadless MICRA AV + epicardial AAI) safe and feasible in a patient with high infection risk and ventricular lead failure?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Is hybrid permanent cardiac pacing (leadless MICRA AV + epicardial AAI) safe and feasible in a patient with high infection risk and ventricular lead failure?
Hybrid permanent cardiac pacing using a leadless MICRA AV device and an existing epicardial system programmed to AAI mode is feasible and safe without electrical interference in a patient with high infection risk.
<ns3:p>Infective complications of permanent cardiac pacing severely influence long-term outcomes despite system removal and targeted antibiotics. In-hospital mortality reaches 4,6 % and 1-year – 14-17%. A case of a 68-year-old patient was described. The patient suffered from infective endocarditis, which caused the extraction of a formerly implanted standard dual-chamber pacemaker and insertion of bioprosthesis of the aortic valve and epicardial DDD system implantation. After 9 years during follow-up increase of impedance and threshold on ventricular lead have been observed. Due to temporal pacemaker dependency, the decision was made to implant a leadless MICRA AV device with preservation of active atrial pacing through an epicardial DDD system programmed to AAI mode. No procedural complications were observed. There was no electrical interference between implanted systems.</ns3:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitkowski et al. (2023) conducted a case report in High infection risk requiring permanent cardiac pacing (n=1). Leadless MICRA AV device combined with epicardial DDD system programmed to AAI mode was evaluated on Procedural complications and electrical interference.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: