Key result
Taking the prick inside the pocket during device implantation cuts pneumothorax ~71% vs conventional methods.
Why the study?
Complications from CIED implantation threaten the site for future procedures due to infection and venous fibrosis, prompting evaluation of a modified technique to preserve the site and reduce index complications.
Does a novel CIED implantation strategy with the puncture site inside the pocket reduce procedural complications compared to conventional implantation in patients requiring CIEDs?
RCT (n=602)
Randomly divided into two groups
No
Does a novel CIED implantation strategy with the puncture site inside the pocket reduce procedural complications compared to conventional implantation in patients requiring CIEDs?
A modified CIED implantation technique that places the puncture site inside the pocket and uses minimal lead length reduces acute procedural complications and may help preserve the site for future interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reduces pneumothorax risk with inside-pocket puncture in CIED implantation; extends randomized evidence for procedural technique optimization.
Introduction Implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is an art of science. As the volume of implantation has increased worldwide, so has the rate of complications. Infection, fibrosis, lead and device erosion, lead displacement, right ventricle perforation, lead fracture, and insulation break are the common complications in the implantation process. This exposes the patient for reopening and threatens the implantation for further complication due to infection, fibrosis of veins, failure to retrieve the implanted wire, and failure to re-implant the device on the same site. We slightly changed our implantation technique to preserve the implantation site for future implantation and reduce the rate of complication in the index implantation. Methods This randomized control trial was conducted from January 2016 to September 2019 at Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, Pakistan. A consecutive sampling technique was used to obtain a sample size of 602 patients keeping a 95% confidence interval and a 5% margin error. We adopted a strategy to take prick, for implantation of devices, inside the pocket, which reduces the number of sutures, hastens the procedure, prevents erosion, and minimizes the chance of subclavian crush syndrome and insulation break. We also selected the minimum possible length of leads. This will possibly decrease the chances of cumbersome fibrosis around the lead and device and will make future implantation convenient. Results There was a total of 602 procedures in the study period. About 253 (42%) procedures were done in the newly adopted strategy and 349 (58%) were performed in the conventional way. Our complication rate grossly reduces in the novel way of implantation in which we took our prick inside the pocket. Conclusion A slight modification in the implantation of CIEDs not only prevents the rate of complication in the index implantation but will also possibly preserve the site for future implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation (n=602). Novel implantation strategy (prick inside the pocket and minimum lead length) vs. Conventional implantation method was evaluated on Pneumothorax. A novel strategy for cardiac device implantation involving taking the prick inside the pocket significantly reduced the rate of pneumothorax compared to the conventional method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: