Key result
LBBAP is associated with ~13 ms QRS narrowing and improved cardiac function in RBBB.
Why the study?
Although permanent LBBAP corrects left bundle branch block, its correction potential in patients with RBBB remains largely unexplored.
Does permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) improve QRS duration and cardiac function in patients with right bundle branch block?
Observational (n=20)
No
Does permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) improve QRS duration and cardiac function in patients with right bundle branch block?
Absolute Event Rate: 119.55% vs 132.6%
p-value: p=0.046
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing in patients with right bundle branch block is safe and effectively reduces QRS duration while improving left ventricular ejection fraction and mitral regurgitation.
LBBAP was associated with QRS narrowing and improved function in RBBB; hypothesis-generating and leaves open outcome benefits versus conventional pacing in RCTs.
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been established as an effective means to correct left bundle branch block. Right bundle branch block (RBBB), emerge as a distinct form of cardiac conduction abnormality, can be seen in the context of LBBAP procedure. However, the correction potential of LBBAP in patients with RBBB remains largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of permanent LBBAP in patients with RBBB. Ninety-two consecutive patients who underwent successful permanent LBBAP were recruited from May. 2019 to Dec. 2022 in Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital. Among them, 20 patients with RBBB were included in our analysis. These patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-LBBAP. The QRS duration (QRSd) on the V1 lead of the 12-lead elctrocardiogram was measured and compared before and after the LBBAP procedure. Additionally, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation and cardiac function were assessed using transthoracic echocardiography, specifically focusing on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mitral regurgitation severity. The acute pitfills and delayed complications associated with the LBBAP procedure were recorded to evaluate its safety. SPSS 23.0 was used to perform statistical analysis with Student’s t test or one way ANOVA or nonparametric tests (paired Wilcoxon test). A p value less than 0.05 was defined as significant. The demographic breakdown of the RBBB cohort revealed a mean age of 66.35 ± 11.55 years, 60% being male. Comorbidities were prevalent, including severe atrioventricular block (AVB) in 75%, sick sinus syndrome (SSS) in 20%, heart failure in 25%, atrial fibrillation in 30%, coronary heart diseases in 45%, hypertension in 35%, and diabetes mellitus in 15%. Regarding the LBBAP procedure, the average operation time was 106.53 ± 2.72 min, with 45% of patients (9 individuals) requiring temporary cardiac pacing during the surgery. Notably, the LBBAP procedure significantly narrow the QRS duration in RBBB patients, from 132.60 ± 31.49ms to 119.55 ± 18.58 ms (P = 0.046). Additionally, at the 12-month follow-up, we observed a marked improvement in LVEF, which increased significantly from 55.15 ± 10.84% to 58.5 ± 10.55% (P = 0.018). Furthermore, mitral regurgitation severity improved, with a median reduction from 4.46 (0.9, 7.3) to 2.29 (0, 3.49) cm2 (P = 0.033). Importantly, no cases of ventricular septum perforation or pericardial effusion were reported during the LBBAP procedure or during the follow-up period. LBBAP provides an immediate reduction in QRS duration for patients suffering from RBBB, accompanied by improvements in mitral regurgitation and cardiac function as evident in the 12-month follow-up period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Right bundle branch block (RBBB) (n=20). Permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) vs. Baseline (pre-procedure) was evaluated on QRS duration (QRSd) (p=0.046). Permanent left bundle branch area pacing significantly narrowed QRS duration from 132.60 ms to 119.55 ms and improved cardiac function in patients with right bundle branch block.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: