Key result
Successful pacemaker extraction in a burn patient with bacteremia precedes death from subsequent fungemia.
Why the study?
Annual CIED implants are increasing, raising the risk of device exposure, but management issues following traumatic thermal injury require clarification.
Case Report (n=1)
No
This case highlights the complex management of exposed cardiovascular implantable electronic devices following severe thermal burns, including the risks of infection and extraction-related complications.
Annual implants of cardiovascular implantable devices (CIEDs) are increasing, thus increasing the risk of device exposure. This case presents CIED management issues following traumatic thermal injury. A 59-year-old female presented to intensive care with 42% total body surface area burn involving tissue over her pacemaker generator. Electrophysiologists interrogated and reprogrammed the pacer and observed the patient over 72 hours without pacing. Serratia bacteremia developed and cardiology recommended device removal. The pacemaker generator and leads were removed by cardiothoracic and burn surgery. Postoperatively, asystole required emergency transvenous pacing wire placement. During bacteremia treatment, cardiology planned to pace with an active-fixation screw-in lead with long-term plans to place a single right ventricular chamber leadless pacemaker because of the extensive burns. The patient developed fungemia and the family opted for comfort care. This case report discusses the management of a CIED exposed after a traumatic thermal burn, including device extraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maxwell et al. (2019) conducted a case report in Exposed pacemaker caused by burns (n=1). Pacemaker generator and lead extraction was evaluated. A 59-year-old female with an exposed pacemaker due to extensive thermal burns underwent successful device extraction following Serratia bacteremia, but ultimately expired due to subsequent fungemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: