PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 6, 2025Mathematics2 citationsOpen Access

A Bird’s-Eye View on a New Stochastic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

View Full Paper
OFOlavo Leopoldino da Silva FilhoMFMarcello Ferreira

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Since the early twentieth century, quantum mechanics has sought an interpretation that offers a consistent worldview. In the course of that, many proposals were advanced, but all of them introduce, at some point, interpretation elements (semantics) that find no correlate in the formalism (syntactics). This distance from semantics and syntactics is one of the major reasons for finding so abstruse and diverse interpretations of the formalism. To overcome this issue, we propose an alternative stochastic interpretation, based exclusively on the formal structure of the Schrödinger equation, without resorting to external assumptions such as the collapse of the wave function or the role of the observer. We present four (mathematically equivalent) mathematical derivations of the Schrödinger equation based on four constructs: characteristic function, Boltzmann entropy, Central Limit Theorem (CLT), and Langevin equation. All of them resort to axioms already interpreted and offer complementary perspectives to the quantum formalism. The results show the possibility of deriving the Schrödinger equation from well-defined probabilistic principles and that the wave function represents a probability amplitude in the configuration space, with dispersions linked to the CLT. It is concluded that quantum mechanics has a stochastic support, originating from the separation between particle and field subsystems, allowing an objective description of quantum behavior as a mean-field theory, analogous, but not equal, to Brownian motion, without the need for arbitrary ontological entities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Filho et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ee681a14f152feaf9fecahttps://doi.org/10.3390/math13213571
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper