Strong lensing provides a powerful means of investigating the nature of dark matter as it probes dark matter structure on sub-galactic scales. We present an extension of a forward modelling framework that uses flux ratios from quadruply imaged quasars (quads) to measure the shape and amplitude of the halo mass function, including line-of-sight (LOS) haloes and main deflector subhaloes. We apply this machinery to 50 mock lenses – roughly the number of known quads – with warm dark matter (WDM) mass functions exhibiting free-streaming cut-offs parametrized by the half-mode mass mhm. Assuming cold dark matter (CDM), we forecast bounds on mhm and the corresponding thermal relic particle masses over a range of tidal destruction severity, assuming a particular WDM mass function and mass–concentration relation. With significant tidal destruction, at 2σ we constrain mₕₘ< 107.9 (108.4) \, M, or a 4.4 (3.1) keV thermal relic, with image flux uncertainties from measurements and lens modelling of 2\ per\ cent (6\ per\ cent). With less severe tidal destruction we constrain mₕₘ< 10⁷ (107.4) \, M, or an 8.2 (6.2) keV thermal relic. If dark matter is warm, with mₕₘ = 107.7 \, M (5.1 keV), we would favour WDM with mₕₘ > 107.7 \, M over CDM with relative likelihoods of 22:1 and 8:1 with flux uncertainties of 2\ per\ cent and 6\ per\ cent, respectively. These bounds improve over those obtained by modelling only main deflector subhaloes because LOS objects produce additional flux perturbations, especially for high-redshift systems. These results indicate that ∼50 quads can conclusively differentiate between WDM and CDM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilman et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: