Key result
Internet-based cardiac rehabilitation fails to improve anxiety, depression, or quality of life vs usual care in IHD.
Why the study?
The impact of internet-based cardiac rehabilitation on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with ischemic heart disease remains inconclusive.
Does internet-based cardiac rehabilitation improve anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with ischemic heart disease compared to usual care?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,256)
Yes
Does internet-based cardiac rehabilitation improve anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with ischemic heart disease compared to usual care?
Internet-based cardiac rehabilitation does not significantly improve anxiety, depression, or quality of life compared to usual care in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Internet-based cardiac rehabilitation offers no clear psychosocial benefit; confirms limited efficacy for anxiety, depression, or QoL in IHD.
BACKGROUND: Internet-based cardiac rehabilitation (IBCR) is an innovative, alternative platform used in current practice for the secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease (IHD). The impact of IBCR on anxiety, depression, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with IHD remains inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of IBCR on anxiety, depression, and QoL among patients with IHD. METHODS: Five databases (Embase, CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science) and additional resources were searched to identify studies published between January 2014 and March 2024. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist were used. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality, eligibility, and data extraction. RevMan (version 5.3) software was used for the meta-analysis. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023387666). RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included across 9 countries. A total of 2256 participants, with a mean age ranging from 55 to 63 years, the majority being men (73%), were identified. IBCR did not significantly reduce anxiety (P = .22) or depression (P = .44) or increase QoL (P = .21) compared with usual care. Intervention was delivered mainly via smartphones. Physical activities and risk factor management were mostly used, and behavioral changes less likely occurred. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was mostly used. CONCLUSIONS: IBCR was comparable to the effects of usual care in cardiac rehabilitation. Theory-driven interventions with larger and diverse sample sizes, and longer durations across different regions, are recommended for reliable findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maithreepala et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Ischemic Heart Disease (n=2,256). Internet-based cardiac rehabilitation vs. Usual care was evaluated on Anxiety, depression, and quality of life (p=0.22, 0.44, 0.21). Internet-based cardiac rehabilitation did not significantly reduce anxiety (P=0.22), depression (P=0.44), or increase quality of life (P=0.21) compared with usual care in patients with IHD.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: