Escherichia coli double-strand uracil-DNA glycosylase (Dug) was purified to apparent homogeneity as both a native and recombinant protein. The molecular weight of recombinant Dug was 18 670, as determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization mass spectrometry. Dug was active on duplex oligonucleotides (34-mers) that contained site-specific U.G, U.A, ethenoC.G, and ethenoC.A targets; however, activity was not detected on DNA containing a T.G mispair or single-stranded DNA containing either a site-specific uracil or ethenoC residue. One of the distinctive characteristics of Dug was that the purified enzyme excised a near stoichiometric amount of uracil from U.G-containing oligonucleotide substrate. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that the lack of turnover was the result of strong binding by Dug to the reaction product apyrimidinic-site (AP) DNA. Addition of E. coli endonuclease IV stimulated Dug activity by enhancing the rate and extent of uracil excision by promoting dissociation of Dug from the AP. G-containing 34-mer. Catalytically active endonuclease IV was apparently required to mediate Dug turnover, since the addition of 5 mM EDTA mitigated the effect. Further support for this interpretation came from the observations that Dug preferentially bound 34-mer containing an AP.G target, while binding was not observed on a substrate incised 5' to the AP-site. We also investigated whether Dug could initiate a uracil-mediated base excision repair pathway in E. coli NR8052 cell extracts using M13mp2op14 DNA (form I) containing a site-specific U.G mispair. Analysis of reaction products revealed a time dependent appearance of repaired form I DNA; addition of purified Dug to the cell extract stimulated the rate of repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: