Key result
Myocardial extracellular volume fraction measured by low-radiation-dose cardiac CT showed good correlation with cardiac MR imaging (r = 0.82, P < .001).
Why the study?
Does cardiac CT accurately measure extracellular volume fraction compared to cardiac MR imaging in healthy subjects and heart failure patients?
Observational (n=24)
Does cardiac CT accurately measure extracellular volume fraction compared to cardiac MR imaging in healthy subjects and heart failure patients?
Effect estimate: r = 0.82
p-value: p=< .001
Cardiac CT can accurately measure myocardial extracellular volume fraction with low radiation dose, showing good correlation with the reference standard of cardiac MRI.
Supports low-dose CT for ECV assessment; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: To develop a cardiac computed tomographic (CT) method with which to determine extracellular volume (ECV) fraction, with cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study participants provided written informed consent to participate in this institutional review board-approved study. ECV was measured in healthy subjects and patients with heart failure by using cardiac CT and cardiac MR imaging. Paired Student t test, linear regression analysis, and Pearson correlation analysis were used to determine the relationship between cardiac CT and MR imaging ECV values and clinical parameters. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects were studied. There was good correlation between myocardial ECV measured at cardiac MR imaging and that measured at cardiac CT (r = 0.82, P < .001). As expected, ECV was higher in patients with heart failure than in healthy control subjects for both cardiac CT and cardiac MR imaging (P = .03, respectively). For both cardiac MR imaging and cardiac CT, ECV was positively associated with end diastolic and end systolic volume and inversely related to ejection fraction (P < .05 for all). Mean radiation dose was 1.98 mSv ± 0.16 (standard deviation) for each cardiac CT acquisition. CONCLUSION: ECV at cardiac CT and that at cardiac MR imaging showed good correlation, suggesting the potential for myocardial tissue characterization with cardiac CT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nacif et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Heart failure and healthy subjects (n=24). Cardiac computed tomography (CT) vs. Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was evaluated on Correlation between myocardial ECV measured at cardiac MR imaging and cardiac CT (r = 0.82, p=< .001). Myocardial extracellular volume fraction measured by low-radiation-dose cardiac CT showed good correlation with cardiac MR imaging (r = 0.82, P < .001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: