Key result
Faricimab individualized dosing maintains visual improvements at 48 weeks with up to ~8 letter gains.
Why the study?
To assess visual and anatomic outcomes by individualized treatment intervals at week 48 in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration treated with faricimab.
Does faricimab with individualized treatment intervals improve visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration?
RCT (n=665)
double-masked
randomized
Does faricimab with individualized treatment intervals improve visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration?
Faricimab administered at individualized intervals up to every 16 weeks maintains visual and anatomic improvements in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Supports individualized faricimab dosing up to Q16W in nAMD; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
PURPOSE: To assess the visual and anatomic outcomes by individualized treatment intervals at week 48 in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with the dual angiopoietin-2/VEGF-A inhibitor faricimab in a post hoc analysis of pooled data from TENAYA/LUCERNE. DESIGN: TENAYA/LUCERNE (NCT03823287/NCT03823300) were identically designed, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled, noninferiority phase III trials. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naïve patients ≥50 years of age with nAMD randomized to the faricimab up to every 16 weeks (Q16W; n = 665) arm. METHODS: Patients in the faricimab arm received 4 initial doses every 4 weeks through week 12. At weeks 20 and 24, they were assigned to fixed every 8 weeks (Q8W), every 12 weeks (Q12W), or every 16 weeks (Q16W) treatment intervals through week 60, based on prespecified central subfield thickness (CST) or best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) disease activity criteria or presence of new macular hemorrhage, per investigator clinical examination. The primary analysis was at week 48. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean changes from baseline in BCVA and CST through week 48 by treatment interval group. RESULTS: At week 48, the proportion of faricimab-treated patients on each treatment interval was 45.3% (Q16W), 33.4% (Q12W), and 21.2% (Q8W). The baseline patient characteristics were well balanced across faricimab treatment intervals. However, patients assigned to treatment at Q16W and Q12W had less severe disease at baseline than patients assigned to Q8W. All patients showed sustained BCVA gains and CST reductions through week 48. Mean (95% confidence interval) change from baseline in BCVA was +7.9 letters (6.6 to 9.2), +4.0 letters (2.2 to 5.7), and +5.3 letters (2.4 to 8.2); and that in CST was -142.9 μm (-156.9 to -128.9), -112.5 μm (-131.0 to -94.1), and -165.1 μm (-193.8 to -136.4) for Q16W, Q12W, and Q8W, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vision and anatomic improvements were achieved and maintained in all faricimab individualized treatment interval groups, with patients treated at longer intervals having more stable outcomes with fewer injections. The clinically relevant disease activity criteria based on vision or anatomy allowed treatment of patients with nAMD to be rapidly extended after the initial dosing phase while maintaining visual gains through week 48 of TENAYA/LUCERNE. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
London et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) (n=665). faricimab vs. active comparator was evaluated on Mean changes from baseline in BCVA and CST through week 48 by treatment interval group. Faricimab individualized treatment intervals maintained visual improvements at week 48, with mean BCVA gains of +7.9, +4.0, and +5.3 letters for Q16W, Q12W, and Q8W intervals, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: