Key result
An artificial neural network analyzing prolonged fetal heart rate monitoring successfully differentiated 4 normal cases (difference >0) from 5 cases of neonatal depression (difference <0).
Why the study?
Can an artificial neural network accurately evaluate prolonged fetal heart rate monitoring to predict neonatal outcomes?
Observational (n=9)
Can an artificial neural network accurately evaluate prolonged fetal heart rate monitoring to predict neonatal outcomes?
An artificial neural network calculating the difference between normal and pathologic outcome probabilities may provide an objective parameter for evaluating prolonged fetal heart rate monitoring.
May aid objective fetal heart rate assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate prolonged fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring, which has been difficult to do with conventional cardiotocogram (CTG). METHODS: FHR was analyzed by an artificial neural network computer that calculates probabilities of normal, pathologic and suspicious outcome. Earlier normal and pathologic outcome probabilities (OPs) recorded during 15-min intervals are averaged every 5 min. Initially, two curves (the averaged normal and pathologic OPs) are compared. Furthermore, a single curve traced for each difference between the averaged normal and pathologic OPs and its value are studied. Our FHR probability data are of 9 cases reported in a previous paper on neural network FHR analysis. RESULTS: In the 4 cases of normal neonatal condition, the trends of the averaged curves and the last averaged values were higher for normal OP than for pathologic OP, and the final values of the difference were >0. On the other hand, in the 5 cases of neonatal depression, the trend of the two curves and the final values were lower for normal than for pathologic OP; and the final difference values of averaged probabilities were <0. For prolonged monitoring, the single parameter is more useful than the comparison of the two curves. CONCLUSION: A useful single parameter is obtained for the accurate and objective evaluation of prolonged FHR monitoring. The present method is promising for prospective studies using the combined system of experts and neural computers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maeda et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Fetal heart rate monitoring (n=9). Artificial neural network computer analysis of FHR was evaluated on Normal and pathologic outcome probabilities. An artificial neural network analyzing prolonged fetal heart rate monitoring successfully differentiated 4 normal cases (difference >0) from 5 cases of neonatal depression (difference <0).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: