This randomized trial investigates LSTMs for extracting opinion entities and relations, highlighting potential in deep learning approaches.
We investigate the use of deep bidirectional LSTMs for joint extraction of opinion entities and the IS-FROM and IS-ABOUT relations that connect them -the first such attempt using a deep learning approach. Perhaps surprisingly, we find that standard LSTMs are not competitive with a state-of-the-art CRF+ILP joint inference approach Incorporating sentence-level and a novel relation-level optimization, however, allows the LSTM to identify opinion relations and to perform within 1-3% of the state-of-the-art joint model for opinion entities and the IS-FROM relation; and to perform as well as the state-of-theart for the IS-ABOUT relation -all without access to opinion lexicons, parsers and other preprocessing components required for the feature-rich CRF+ILP approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katiyar et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: