Key result
The extended statistical mechanical theory of muscular contraction incorporates groups of actin sites and cross-bridge slipping, providing an alternative molecular interpretation of the Huxley-Simmons model.
This theoretical paper extends the statistical mechanics model of muscular contraction to include cross-bridge interactions with multiple actin sites.
Extends molecular models of contraction; leaves open validation in cardiac muscle systems.
It was shown in an earlier paper how to connect, in principle, the biochemical states of a cross-bridge with the mechanics of muscular contraction, by the methods of statistical mechanics. The treatment applies to cross-bridges that are able to interact with only one actin site at a time. The present paper shows that it is a straightforward matter to extend the theory to groups of actin sites (three, five, etc.), say 55 A apart, as suggested by the work of Moore, H. E. Huxley, and DeRosier. The possibility of the cross-bridge attachment slipping between sites is included. This provides an alternative molecular interpretation of the model introduced by A. F. Huxley and Simmons. A second possible interpretation is also suggested: their discrete stable angles correspond to different biochemical (attached) states. The Huxley-Simmons analysis of an example is rederived and extended somewhat (x averaging), from the point of view of the present theory. Their qualitative conclusions are left unchanged by the x averaging, but significant quantitative effects are possible. Possible consequences of fast slipping in isotonic contraction are discussed in a preliminary way.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terrell L. Hill (1973) studied Muscular contraction (theoretical model). Theoretical model extension was evaluated. The extended statistical mechanical theory of muscular contraction incorporates groups of actin sites and cross-bridge slipping, providing an alternative molecular interpretation of the Huxley-Simmons model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: