Why the study?
Women with ACS experience worse outcomes than men due to misdiagnosis, delayed care, and a lack of healthcare professional awareness regarding sex-and-gender specific presentations and risk factors.
A new sex- and gender-specific chest-pain assessment protocol was developed to improve the acute recognition and management of chest-pain syndromes in women presenting to the emergency department.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Facilitates sex-specific chest pain triage in EDs; extends guidelines with a novel algorithmic protocol.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in women worldwide, and of premature death in women in Canada. Despite improvements in cardiovascular care over the past 15-20 years, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and CVD mortality continue to increase among women in Canada. Chest pain is a common symptom leading to emergency department visits for both men and women. However, women with ACS experience worse outcomes. compared with those of men, due to misdiagnosis or lack of diagnosis resulting in delayed care and underuse of guideline-directed medical therapies. CVD mortality rates are highest in Indigenous and racialized women and those with a disproportionately high number of adverse social determinants of health. CVD remains underrecognized, underdiagnosed, undertreated, and underresearched in women. Moreover, a lack of awareness of unique symptoms, clinical presentations, and sex-and-gender specific CVD risk factors, by healthcare professionals, leads to outcome disparities. In response to this knowledge gap, in acute recognition and management of chest-pain syndromes in women, the Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance performed a needs assessment and review of CVD risk factors and ACS pathophysiology, through a sex and gender lens, and then developed a unique chest-pain assessment protocol utilizing modified dynamic programming algorithmic methodology. The resulting algorithmic protocol is presented. The output is intended as a quick reference algorithm that could be posted in emergency departments and other acute-care settings. Next steps include protocol implementation evaluation and impact assessment on CVD outcomes in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaffer et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: