Key result
Remote ischemic preconditioning cuts myocardial infarct size ~50% in preclinical models.
Why the study?
Ischemic preconditioning may reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury locally and remotely, but its effects on remote endothelial IR injury and myocardial infarct size were unclear.
Does transient limb ischemia induce remote ischemic preconditioning and reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans and myocardial infarct size in experimental animals?
Does transient limb ischemia induce remote ischemic preconditioning and reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans and myocardial infarct size in experimental animals?
Absolute Event Rate: 26% vs 53%
p-value: p=<0.05
Transient remote limb ischemia is a simple stimulus that successfully induces ischemic preconditioning, protecting against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans and reducing myocardial infarct size in animals.
Remote ischemic preconditioning may preserve endothelial function in ischemia; extends animal infarct reduction to human endothelial outcomes.
Background— Ischemic preconditioning reduces local tissue injury caused by subsequent ischemia-reperfusion (IR), but may also have a salutary effect on IR injury of tissues remote from those undergoing preconditioning. We tested the hypothesis that limb ischemia induces remote preconditioning, reduces endothelial IR injury in humans, and reduces experimental myocardial infarct size. Methods and Results— Endothelial IR injury of the human forearm was induced by 20 minutes of upper limb ischemia (inflation of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg) followed by reperfusion. Remote preconditioning was induced by three 5-minute cycles of ischemia of the contralateral limb. Venous occlusion plethysmography was used to assess forearm blood flow in response to acetylcholine at baseline and 15 minutes after reperfusion. Experimental myocardial infarction was achieved by 40 minutes of balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending artery in 15-kg pigs. Remote preconditioning was induced by four 5-minute cycles of lower limb ischemia. Triphenyltetrazolium staining was used to assess the extent of myocardial infarction. In the human study, the response to acetylcholine was significantly attenuated in the control group after 15 minutes’ reperfusion, but remote preconditioning prevented this reduction. Limb ischemia caused a significant reduction in the extent of myocardial infarction relative to the area at risk compared with control (26±9% versus 53±8%, P <0.05). Conclusion— Remote ischemic preconditioning prevents IR-induced endothelial dysfunction in humans and reduces the extent of myocardial infarction in experimental animals. Transient limb ischemia is a simple preconditioning stimulus with important potential clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kharbanda et al. (2002) studied Ischemia-reperfusion injury. Remote ischemic preconditioning (transient limb ischemia) vs. Control was evaluated on Extent of myocardial infarction relative to area at risk (in pigs) (p=<0.05). Remote ischemic preconditioning by transient limb ischemia significantly reduced the extent of myocardial infarction in experimental animals compared with control (26% vs 53%, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: