One of the principal challenges of religious studies is the lack of a widely accepted normative definition of the terms ‘religion’ and ‘spirituality.’ Responding to recent calls for methodological innovation in this field, in this paper we present a “bottom-up” approach to outlining these concepts based on an interdisciplinary, usage-based approach, which combines qualitative analysis with methods of distributional semantics. Based on the Firthian principle that a word may be known “by the company it keeps,” we used a convenience sample of 138,000 Tweets gathered between March and April 2021 to calculate seven clusters of terms related to ‘spirituality’ and ‘religion.’ Three authors then coded these clusters to propose a tentative name for each. An unsupervised sentiment analysis was conducted and presented on a concept map. We suggest that the Twitter (now ‘X’) data at hand echoes the popular perception of ‘spirituality’ as a positively connoted term, which contrasts with a negatively connoted ‘religion.’ However, the data may be interpreted to arrive at more nuanced and, at times, contradictory interpretations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winiger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: