Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of methods to estimate ball spin rate and spin axis direction using multi-camera tracking technology. The method implemented by Hawk-Eye and a theoretical ball trajectory model were assessed for their accuracy against high speed-vision. A theoretical ball trajectory model was found to estimate ball spin rate and the spin axis direction more accurately than the method used by Hawk-Eye. The superior performance of the ball trajectory model was indicated by a lower mean bias and standard deviation (2.92 ± 222.76) than Hawk-Eye (-100.01 ± 542.44), as well as narrower limits of agreement and a 327.63 RPM lower RMSE. Spin rates less than 4500 RPM were estimated with the highest accuracy, but neither method was able to consistently and accurately estimate spin rates >4500 RPM. The application of a trajectory model to multi-camera ball tracking data provides a practical and non-invasive method to accurately estimate the spin imparted when hitting, allowing for large-scale collection of spin rates during matches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cant et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: