PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1987Circulation139 citationsOpen Access

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: studies on upper and lower 'common pathways'.

View Full Paper
JMJohn M. MillerMRMark RosenthalJVJoseph A. Vassallo

Key Result

Electrophysiologic studies in patients with AV nodal reentrant SVT demonstrated upper common pathways in 29% and lower common pathways in 75%.

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the presence of upper and lower common pathways in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.
  • Performed electrophysiologic studies in 28 patients with documented atrioventricular nodal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia.
  • Investigated the presence of upper common pathways (UCP) and lower common pathways (LCP) through pacing and response assessment.
  • Analyzed the relationship between AV nodal conduction properties and the tachycardia circuit.
  • UCPs identified in 8 of 28 patients (29%) through AV Wenckebach and paced atrium-His interval differences.
  • LCPs identified in 21 of 28 patients (75%) with significant paced HA interval differences.
  • UCPs were more likely to manifest via Wenckebach criteria compared to LCP (p<0.05).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=28)

Structured PICO

P
Population
28 patients with documented atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT)
I
Intervention
Electrophysiologic studies consisting of atrial then ventricular pacing at the SVT cycle length
O
Outcome
Presence of AV nodal tissue situated between the tachycardia circuit and both the atrium (upper common pathway, UCP) and the His bundle (lower common pathway, LCP)surrogate

Electrophysiologic studies demonstrate that the AV nodal reentrant SVT circuit is frequently surrounded by upper and lower common pathways with distinct conduction properties, which may affect the initiation or termination of the tachycardia.

Main Result

p-value: p=<0.05

Abstract

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 28 patients with documented atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) to investigate the presence of AV nodal tissue situated between the tachycardia circuit and both the atrium (upper common pathway, UCP) and the His bundle (lower common pathway, LCP). All patients demonstrated a 1:1 AV relationship during SVT. The study protocol consisted of atrial then ventricular pacing at the SVT cycle length. UCPs were manifested in eight of 28 (29%) patients by either antegrade AV Wenckebach (six patients) or a paced atrium-His (AH) interval exceeding the AH in SVT (two patients, differences 5 and 9 msec). LCPs were manifested in 21 of 28 (75%) patients by either retrograde Wenckebach periodicity (two patients) or a paced HA interval exceeding the HA in SVT (19 patients, mean difference 25 +/- 20 msec). By these criteria, eight patients (29%) had evidence for both UCPs and LCPs. UCPs were more likely than LCPs to be manifested by Wenckebach criteria (p less than .05). Thus the AV nodal reentrant SVT circuit appears to be intranodal and is frequently surrounded by AV nodal tissue (UCP and LCP), antegrade and retrograde conduction properties of these common pathways are discordant in some cases, and conduction properties of UCP tissue differ from those of LCP tissue. These findings may have relevance in that the UCP or LCP may limit the ability of premature extrastimuli to penetrate the circuit to initiate or terminate AV nodal SVT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miller et al. (1987) conducted an observational in Atrioventricular nodal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) (n=28). Electrophysiologic study (atrial and ventricular pacing) was evaluated on Presence of upper common pathway (UCP) and lower common pathway (LCP) (p=<0.05). Electrophysiologic studies in patients with AV nodal reentrant SVT demonstrated upper common pathways in 29% and lower common pathways in 75%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f2025a00258d2006c94c6https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.75.5.930
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper