Key result
NOGA electromechanical mapping correlated closely with echocardiography for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.92) and detected pharmacologically induced changes in contractility.
Why the study?
Does NOGA electromechanical mapping accurately assess regional and global left ventricular function compared to echocardiography in a porcine model?
Does NOGA electromechanical mapping accurately assess regional and global left ventricular function compared to echocardiography in a porcine model?
NOGA electromechanical mapping correlates closely with echocardiography for assessing global and regional LV function and is sensitive to contractility changes, though it underestimates LV function at the upper end.
Assessment of left ventricular (LV) function in the catheterization laboratory is important to optimize treatment decisions and guide catheter-based local therapies. NOGA electromechanical mapping was developed to assess LV contraction during catheterization; however, quantitative analysis of its "local shortening" (LS) algorithm and direct comparison with conventional methods are lacking. We evaluated the accuracy of NOGA-based regional and global function by examining its ability to detect pharmacologically induced changes in contractility compared with echocardiography. Ten anesthetized pigs were paced to ensure a constant heart rate throughout the experiment. Electromechanical maps of the LV and short-axis echocardiograms were obtained 1) at baseline, 2) during intravenous dobutamine, and 3) after intravenous propranolol. NOGA LS and ejection fraction (EF) consistently increased under dobutamine and decreased after propranolol. NOGA LS and NOGA and echocardiography circumferential shortening correlated highly with one another (r > 0.80), as did NOGA EF with echocardiography EF (r = 0.92), although absolute values differed somewhat. Thus NOGA-based global and regional function correlates closely with echocardiography and is sensitive to changes in contractility, but, at the upper end of the scale, LV function is underestimated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lessick et al. (2002) studied Left ventricular function assessment (n=10). NOGA electromechanical mapping vs. Echocardiography was evaluated on Correlation of NOGA local shortening and ejection fraction with echocardiography (r = 0.92). NOGA electromechanical mapping correlated closely with echocardiography for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.92) and detected pharmacologically induced changes in contractility.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: