Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are considered the most robust and reliable forms of evidence to guide clinical practice. Previous research has demonstrated year-over-year increases in the number of published RCTs between 1950 and 2007 1 as well as increases in the number of published SRMAs through 2016. The increase in SRMAs is needed to update cumulative evidence, 2 although some investigators speculate that SRMAs may also serve as "easily publishable units or marketing tools." Given this context, we sought to compare publication trends overall and across clinical topic areas among SRMAs and RCTs over the past 22 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niforatos et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: