Why the study?
Controversy exists regarding whether to place an internal carotid artery stent immediately after opening an atherosclerotic acute carotid occlusion, and no objective evaluation system or prospective controlled data exist.
Does surgery guided by the ECASES system improve neurological functional status at 90 days in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion compared to operator's experience?
RCT (n=202)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does surgery guided by the ECASES system improve neurological functional status at 90 days in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion compared to operator's experience?
This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ECASES system for guiding emergency carotid artery stent placement in acute ischemic stroke.
Background: Atherosclerotic acute carotid occlusion is a specific type of stroke, and controversy exists regarding the surgical strategy, that is, whether an internal carotid artery stent should be placed immediately after opening the occluded vessel. There is no objective evaluation system for this procedure. In a previous study, we summarized an evaluation decision system Emergent Carotid Artery Stent placement decision Evaluation System (ECASES) for emergency stent placement. Study design: This is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion confirmed by imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance angiography/digital subtraction angiography) will be randomly divided into the study and control groups, with 101 patients in each group. The study group will undergo surgery according to the ECASES system and the control group will undergo surgery according to the operator’s experience. The postoperative outcomes of the 2 groups will be compared. Study outcomes: Primary outcome: Neurological functional status (modified Rankin Scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores) of patients 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes: neurological function changes, hemorrhage events, cerebral edema, postoperative modified treatment in cerebral infarction grade, new cerebral infarction, and reocclusion of responsible vessels. Discussion: Currently, no prospective controlled data exist regarding the efficacy and safety of carotid stenting in the acute phase. Previously, we had developed an ECASES stent placement system for acute carotid artery occlusion. The present study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ECASES in a randomized, double-blind prospective study and clarify its guiding significance in acute atherosclerotic carotid artery occlusion surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Acute ischemic stroke caused by atherosclerotic carotid occlusion (n=202). Surgery according to the ECASES system vs. Surgery according to the operator's experience was evaluated on Neurological functional status (modified Rankin Scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores) at 90 days postoperatively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: